ISSN 2221-1055  •  e-ISSN 2413-2322

Effectiveness assessment of technical innovations in the implementation of the modern model of the agricultural sector of Ukraine

Received: 03.01.2024 Revised: 14.03.2024 Accepted: 19.04.2024
Abstract

The agricultural sector of Ukraine requires fundamental changes to improve efficiency, rural development and sustainability, which is possible through the implementation of an innovative development model. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the introduction of one of the types of technical innovations – agricultural drones – in the agricultural production of Ukraine. The study uses the dialectical method of scientific cognition, analysis and synthesis, systematic generalisation, comparative analysis, rating method, and the mathematical method of calculation “solution optimisation” using Excel. The study analyses modern approaches to assessing the efficiency of individual processes, which helped to formulate its algorithm for calculating the efficiency of land cultivation using agricultural drones. At the first stage of the study, the technical advantages of agricultural drones were identified, which are manifested in increased labour productivity. The second stage of the study calculated the increase in the main crops (corn, wheat, sunflower, barley, soybeans, rapeseed, peas, buckwheat, and millet) that can be obtained as a result of the use of agricultural drones on a national scale. The third stage of the study yielded an indicator of the economic efficiency of introducing agricultural drones into agricultural production, as well as a forecast of the social and environmental effects. It is emphasised that state support for the Ukrainian production of agricultural drones in various forms (subsidies, preferential lending, leasing, etc.) will contribute to the development of innovative Ukrainian industry, which will positively affect the change in the sectoral structure of the national economy and significantly increase the country's gross domestic product. The following conclusions, suggestions and practical recommendations may be useful in developing relevant programmes and measures aimed at developing the agricultural sector of Ukraine

Keywords
efficiency; agricultural sector; agriculture; innovation; agricultural drones; productivity; sectoral structure
Details
DOI https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202402032
Pages 32-40

[1] ACASOM. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://acasom.com/.

[2] Bakhtiar, A., Ghazinoory, S.S., Aslani, A., & Mafi, V. (2022). Efficiency-effectiveness assessment of national innovation systems: Comparative analysis. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(3), 625-651. doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-03-2021-0044.

[3] Björk, J., Frishammar, J., & Sundström, L. (2023). Measuring innovation effectively – nine critical lessons. Research-Technology Management, 66(2), 17-27. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2022.2151232.

[4] Chérif, R., & Hasanov, F. (2019). The return of the policy that shall not be named: Principles of industrial policy. Washington: International Monetary Fund. doi: 10.5089/9781498305402.001.

[5] Dmytriieva, V. (2021). Efficiency of Ukraine agriculture: Comparative analysis by countries. Modern Economics, 26(2021), 37-43. doi: 10.31521/modecon.V26(2021)-06.

[6] DroneUA. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://drone.ua/.

[7] Filipishyna, L., Bessonova, S., & Venckeviciute, G. (2018). Integral assessment of developmental stability: Cases of Lithuania and Ukraine. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 6(1), 87-99. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(7).

[8] Garazha, O., Cherneha, I., Ulanchuk, V., Skus, O., & Nepochatenko, O. (2023). Agricultural production in Eastern Europe: History, current status, and prospects of development for innovation. Science and Innovation, 19(2), 83-98. doi: 10.15407/scine19.02.083.

[9] Kalinchyk, M., Mohylnyi, O., & Lavrov, R. (2023). Innovative solutions for sustainable development of the agricultural sector of Ukraine: Search for alternative strategies. Agrosvit, 18, 4-18. doi: 10.32702/2306-6792.2023.18.4.

[10] KIT. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.company-kit.com/.

[11] Kray Technologies. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://kray.technology/.

[12] Kucher, L., Kucher, A., Morozova, H., & Pashchenko, Y. (2022). Development of circular agricultural economy: Potential sources of financing innovative projects. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(2), 206-227. doi: 10.51599/are.2022.08.02.11.

[13] Mamchur, V., & Studinska, G. (2023). Innovative development of the agrarian sphere under the conditions of the implementation of the national system of sustainability. Economy and Society, 56. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-56-144.

[14] Mamedova, Ch. (2020). The effectiveness of the use of aviation in agriculture. (Master's thesis, National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine).

[15] Petrenko, A. (2019). A chance to break out of the poverty trap. Retrieved from https://day.kyiv.ua/article/ekonomika/shans-vyrvatysya-iz-pastky-bidnosti.

[16] Petryna, M., Stavnycha, N., Tarayevska, L., Rishchuk, L., & Kushlyk, O. (2020). A methodological approach to the evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative projects. E3S Web of Conferences, 166, article number 13018. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202016613018.

[17] Poltavets, A., & Bahin, M. (2022). Increasing the efficiency of using land resources as a factor of agricultural production growth. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic Sciences, 2(2), 227-231. doi: 10.31891/2307-5740-2022-304-2(2)-35.

[18] Ramazanov, S., & Petrova, M. (2020). Development management and forecasting in a green innovative economy based on the integral dynamics model in the conditions of “Industry – 4.0”. Access to Science, Business, Innovation in Digital Economy, 1(1), 9-30. doi: 10.46656/access.2020.1.1(1).

[19] Reactive Drone. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://reactivedrone.eu/.

[20] Reyes-Rodríguez, J.F., Contreras-Pacheco, O.E., & Chacon Arias, O.P. (2023). Sustainability-oriented innovations and value creation in SMEs: An illustration in the Colombian context. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 777-791. doi: 10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.60.

[21] Shatnenko, K. (2023) Commodity specialization and sustainable industrial development: The case of the Ukrainian economy. In M. Zvieriakov, et al. (Eds.), Theory of development of the national transit economic system in the context of a new stage of globalization (pp. 32-68). Odesa: ONUE.

[22] Shubravska, O. (2023). Introduction. In O. Shubravska (Ed.), Challenges and consequences of Ukraine's agro-food specialization in the global economy (pp. 5-10). Kyiv: SUEP by the NASU.

[23] Skorokhod, I., Skrypchuk, P., Shpak, H., Chemerys, V., & Yakubiv, R. (2022). Assessment of efficiency of the organic production development in Western Polissia regions. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(4), 134-150. doi: 10.51599/are.2022.08.04.06.

[24] Srisathan, W.A., Ketkaew, C., & Naruetharadhol, P. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of open innovation implementation strategies in the promotion of ambidextrous innovation in Thai small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), article number 100418. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100418.

[25] Tigabu Asfaw, G. (2023). Effect of soil and water conservation measures in different slope classes on selected soil physicochemical properties at Addis Zemen District, Ethiopia. Innovations in Agriculture, 6(0), 1-8. doi: 10.25081/ia.2023-031.

[26] Ulko, Y. (2019). Evaluation of economic efficiency of innovations in organic agriculture. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 5(3), 118-140. doi: 10.51599/are.2019.05.03.08.

[27] Union of Ukrainian Entrepreneurs is the voice of independent Ukrainian business. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://sup.org.ua.

[28] Yanchenko, Z. (2013). Assessment of efficiency of innovative activity of agrarian firmAgrosvit, 13, 27-32.

Mamchur, V., & Studinska, G. (2024). Effectiveness assessment of technical innovations in the implementation of the modern model of the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Ekonomika APK, 31(2), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202402032