ISSN 2221-1055  •  e-ISSN 2413-2322

Improving the methodology for calculating the average statistical market price of agricultural land

Received: 03.08.2025 Revised: 04.11.2025 Accepted: 02.12.2025 Published: 30.12.2025
Abstract

Accurate determination of agricultural land market price was essential for informed economic decisions, yet traditional statistical methods demonstrated unacceptably high discrepancies due to statistical outliers and market structural features. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an improved methodology for calculating the market price of agricultural land that ensured stability and reliability of results through the comprehensive application of multi-level data filtering and an adaptive weighting system. The proposed methodology achieved a threefold reduction in price estimate variability (coefficient of variation 17.2% vs. 54% for traditional methods), while maintaining high representativeness of the sample, this ensured more reliable market price calculations. The analysis revealed that traditional methods produced results ranging from 40.4 to 62.2 thousand UAH per hectare with an amplitude of fluctuations of 54%, whereas the developed methodology provided an estimate of 50.3 thousand UAH per hectare with a coefficient of variation of 17.2%, indicating a threefold improvement in estimation stability. Monthly analysis confirmed the methodology’s resilience to seasonal fluctuations and varying intensities of market activity, revealing a price growth trend of 9.3% over 2024-2025 period. Comparison with official calculations of the State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre showed a systematic deviation within 17.8%, reflecting objective methodological differences in approaches to processing market information. The practical value of the developed methodology lies in its applicability for analysing the goals of land market monitoring, valuation activities, and state regulation of land relations

Keywords
pricing methodology; transaction data analysis; multilevel filtering; adaptive weighting; price accuracy; land valuation; data outliers
Details
DOI https://doi.org/10.32317/ekon.apk/6.2025.44
Pages 44-54
  1. Agosta, M., Schimmenti, E., Di Franco, C.P., & Asciuto, A. (2025). Agricultural land markets: A systematic literature review on the factors affecting land prices. Land, 14(5), article number 978. doi: 10.3390/land14050978.
  2. Cherevko, H., & Hryso, M. (2023). Evaluation and price of land in Ukraine and experience of European countries. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, “Economics” Series, 28, 4-13. doi: 10.25264/2311-5149-2023-28(56)-4-13.
  3. Doğan, S., Genç, L., Yücebaş, S.C., & Uşakli, M. (2025). Analyzing agricultural land price prediction using linear regression and XGBoost machine learning algorithms: A case study of Çanakkale. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology, 13(5), 1109-1116. doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v13i5.1109-1116.7379.
  4. Gorgan, M., & Hartvigsen, M. (2022). Development of agricultural land markets in countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Land Use Policy, 120, article number 106257. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106257.
  5. Hunko, L., Moroz, Yu., & Pron, O. (2023). Land valuation in Ukraine: Modern state and development prospects. In Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference “Planning and use of territories within the context of inclusive development” (pp. 179-182). Kharkiv: State Biotechnological University.
  6. Ibatullin, S., Dorosh, Y., Sakal, O., Krupin, V., Kharytonenko, R., & Bratinova, M. (2024). Agricultural land market in Ukraine: Challenges of trade liberalization and future land policy reforms. Land, 13(3), article number 338. doi: 10.3390/land13030338.
  7. Kalinchyk, M., & Mogylnyi, O. (2024). Agricultural land pricing in the member countries of the European Union: Innovative solutions for Ukraine. Kyiv Economic Scientific Journal, 6, 36-46. doi: 10.32782/2786-765X/2024-6-6.
  8. Khakhula, B., & Svynous, N. (2024). Methodical approaches to the assessment of agricultural land in the conditions of formation of the agricultural land market. In Land management industry of Ukraine: Achievements, challenges and prospects: Materials of the III international scientific and practical conference (pp. 50-52). Bila Tserkva: BTNAU.
  9. Kionka, M., Odening, M., Plogmann, J., & Ritter, M. (2021). Measuring liquidity in agricultural land markets. Agricultural Finance Review, 82(4), 690-713. doi: 10.1108/AFR-03-2021-0037.
  10. Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 764-766. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013.
  11. Loh, P.-L. (2025). A theoretical review of modern robust statistics. Annual Review of Statistics and its Application, 12, 477-496. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-112723-034446.
  12. Sasu, A., Javed, A., Imran, M., & Squires, G. (2024). Land banking, land price and Ghana’s informal land markets: A relational complexity approach. Land Use Policy, 141, article number 107133. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107133.
  13. Smaga, I., Myronchuk, K., Tsvyk, T., & Klyutsovich, G. (2023). Assessment of the productive potential and efficience of the use of agroland in the Chernivtsi region. Young Scientist, 7, 79-84. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2023-7-119-15.
  14. State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre. (n.d.). Monitoring of land relations. Retrieved from https://land.gov.ua/index.php/monitorynh-zemelnykh-vidnosyn/.
  15. Udovenko, I., Stepanenko, T., & Likhva, N. (2024). Land value assessment methods and their influence on the market price of land plots. Urban Development and Spatial Planning, 86, 487-503. doi: 10.32347/2076-815x.2024.86.487-503.
  16. Valiyev, A.H., & Mirzayev, N.S. (2023). Ways to improve land assessment methods in Azerbaijan. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Administratio Locorum, 22(3), 421-431. doi: 10.31648/aspal.8979.
  17. Valtiala, J. (2020). Testing for regime-switching behaviour in Finnish agricultural land prices. Agricultural Finance Review, 81(2), 292-305. doi: 10.1108/AFR-03-2020-0037.
  18. Veklych, O., & Boiko, Ye. (2021). The price of agricultural land, taking into account the cost of ecosystem services of soils. Economy of Ukraine, 64(11), 39-54. doi: 10.15407/economyukr.2021.11.039.
  19. Wasilewski, A., Gospodarowicz, M., & Wasilewska, A. (2024). Agricultural land price dynamics in Europe: Convergence, divergence, and policy impacts across EU member states. Sustainability, 16(24), article number 10982. doi: 10.3390/su162410982.
  20. Wu, H., Wang, L., & Peng, F. (2024). Land price regulation and firms’ global value chain position: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 85, article number 102187. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102187.
  21. Yalpir, S., Sisman, S., Akar, A.U., & Unel, F.B. (2021). Feature selection applications and model validation for mass real estate valuation systems. Land Use Policy, 108, article number 105539. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105539.
  22. Yurchenko, I. (2024). Methodical approaches to calculating the price of agricultural land. Efektyvna Ekonomika, 3. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105.2024.3.37.
  23. Zrobek, S., Kovalyshyn, O., Renigier-Biłozor, M., Kovalyshyn, S., & Kovalyshyn, O. (2020). Fuzzy logic method of valuation supporting sustainable development of the agricultural land market. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1094-1105. doi: 10.1002/sd.2061.
Yurchenko, I. (2025). Improving the methodology for calculating the average statistical market price of agricultural land. Ekonomika APK, 32(6), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.32317/ekon.apk/6.2025.44