ISSN 2221-1055  •  e-ISSN 2413-2322

Percolation models of competition and monopolisation in the agricultural market

Received: 25.07.2025 Revised: 27.10.2025 Accepted: 02.12.2025 Published: 30.12.2025
Abstract

The study was relevant due to the growing risks of agricultural market monopolisation in Ukraine, which necessitated a quantitative analysis of concentration processes using modern modeling tools. The purpose of the study was to build a model of monopoly formation in the agricultural market by applying a percolation approach to forecasting phase transitions in a competitive environment. A two-dimensional percolation model of the agricultural market was developed to simulate the capture of market segments by large formations and assess concentration dynamics. Numerical experiments (200×200 domain) showed that as the control parameter approaches the critical value P* = 0.5945, the correlation coefficient of rating-frequency diagrams fell sharply from 0.94-0.97 at P = 0.50-0.58 to 0.55 at P = 0.59, indicating a phase transition interpreted as monopoly cluster formation. Using Ukrainian agricultural market data for 2017-2023, the model identified a critical percolation threshold at P* = 0.59, accompanied by a decline in correlation coefficients from 0.96 to 0.55. A logarithmic relationship W = -0.3839-0.153 lnP−P*∣, R2 = 0.9821 described the growth of dominant clusters. The number of agricultural enterprises declined from 40.7 to 30 thousand (-26%) and average land per enterprise increased from 490 to 576 ha, confirming the intensification of concentration processes and illustrating how geometric cluster behaviour mirrors real structural shifts in the sector, thereby strengthening the applied significance of the developed modelling approach and providing a quantitative framework for detecting early signs of market dominance, assessing systemic vulnerabilities, and interpreting concentration dynamics through the lens of phase-transition phenomena. The practical value of the study lies in enabling early identification of market monopolisation and critical transition points, thereby supporting more accurate forecasting of structural shifts and the development of effective antitrust and regulatory measures

Keywords
clustering; phase transition; market concentration; fractal dimension; market asymmetry; monopoly risk assessment
Details
DOI https://doi.org/10.32317/ekon.apk/6.2025.21
Pages 21-33
  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J.A. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. New York: Penguin Press.
  2. Act Against Restraints of Competition. (1998, August). Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gwb/.
  3. Cerqueti, R., Maranzano, P., & Mattera, R. (2025). Spatially-clustered spatial autoregressive models with application to agricultural market concentration in Europe. Journal of AgriculturalBiological and Environmental Statistics, 30, 431-465. doi: 10.1007/s13253-024-00672-4.
  4. Conyon, M., Ellman, M., Pitelis, C.N., Shipman, A., & Tomlinson, P.R. (2023). Big tech oligopolies, Keith cowling, and monopoly capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 46(6), 1205-1224. doi: 10.1093/cje/beac062.
  5. Donets, S., Lytvynenko, V., Startsev, O., Lonin, Yu., Ponomarev, A., & Uvarov, V. (2023). Fractal analysis of fractograms of aluminum alloys irradiated with high current electron beam. Physics and Chemistry of Solid State, 24(2), 249-255. doi: 10.15330/pcss.24.2.249-255.
  6. Druzhinin, E., Kovalevskyi, M., Pohudina, O., & Cheranovskyi, V. (2021). Methods and information technologies of implementation of unmanned aerial vehicles into the airspace of Ukraine. Systems of Arms and Military Equipment, 4, 84-90. doi: 10.30748/soivt.2021.68.12.
  7. Feder, J., Flekkøy, E.G., & Hansen, A. (2022). Colour plates. In Physics of flow in porous media (pp. 349-364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009100717.018.
  8. Fu, M., Wang, D., Wang, J., & Li, M. (2018). Modeling method of operational task combined with IDEF and UML. In IEEE 3rd advanced information technology, electronic and automation control conference (IAEAC) (pp. 1443-1447). Chongqing: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/IAEAC.2018.8577660.
  9. Grabar, I., & Kilnitska, O. (2025). A new universal generalized method for multifractals synthesisClareus Scientific Science and Engineering, 2(3), 11-19.
  10. Grabar, I., & Kubrak, Yu. (2025). Synthesis of multifractals by Brownian dynamics of a point in a field of N central forces. In C.H. Skiadas & Y. Dimotikalis (Eds.), 16th chaotic modeling and simulation international conference (pp. 157-174). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60907-7_13.
  11. Kilnitska, O. (2017). Determining the monopoly power of an enterprise in the market and its impact on pricing. In International scientific and practical conference “Ukraine, Bulgaria, EU: Economic and social development trends” (pp. 25-28). Burgas: Avangard Prima.
  12. Law of Ukraine No. 2210-III “On Protection of Economic Competition”. (2001, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2210-14#Text.
  13. Law of Ukraine No. 996-XIV “On Accounting and Financial Reporting in Ukraine”. (1999, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-14#Text.
  14. Lucas, A. (2022). Nonequilibrium phase transitions in competitive markets caused by network effects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(40), article number e2206702119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206702119.
  15. Maranzano, P., Boccaletti, S., & Viegas, M. (2025). Inequality and concentration in farmland production and size: A regional analysis for the European Union from 2010 to 2020. Bio-Based and Applied Economicsdoi: 10.36253/bae-17797.
  16. Moretti, E., Loreau, M., & Benzaquen, M. (2025). Farm size matters: A spatially explicit ecological-economic framework for biodiversity and pest management. arXivdoi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.17687.
  17. Mozdzen, A., Addo, F., Krisztin, T., & Kastner, G. (2024). Bayesian nonparametric partial clustering: Quantifying the effectiveness of agricultural subsidies across Europe. arXivdoi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.12868.
  18. Nadal, J.P., Phan, D., Gordan, M.B., & Vannimenus, J. (2003). Monopoly market with externality: An analysis with statistical physics and ACEComputational Economics, article number 0312002.
  19. Nguyen, D.L., Tran, V.B., Dao, N.P., Tran, D.T., Lee, J., & Nguyen, A.Q. (2023). Centralized network model improvement system integrated into UAV swarm. In International conference on advanced technologies for communications (ATC) (pp. 190-195). Da Nang: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ATC58710.2023.10318895.
  20. Savchuk, V. (2018). Graphic model of the target audience of psychological influence in social networks. Information & Security: An International Journal, 41, 81-93. doi: 10.11610/isij.4106.
  21. Shevchuk, T., Bordyuk, M., Mashchenko, V., Kvasnikov, V., & Krivtsov, V. (2022). Percolation characteristics of filled polyurethane auxetics. Physics and Chemistry of Solid State, 23(3), 590-596. doi: 10.15330/pcss.23.3.590-596.
  22. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2024). Complex statistical publications. Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/01/Arch_zor_zb.htm.
  23. Wang, W., Ding, F., Qu, H., & Gong, X. (2023). Mechanism modeling and application of Salvia miltiorrhiza percolation process. Scientific Reports, 13, article number 8311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35529-2.
Grabar, I., Kilnitska, O., Yaremova, M., & Kubrak, Yu. (2025). Percolation models of competition and monopolisation in the agricultural market. Ekonomika APK, 32(6), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.32317/ekon.apk/6.2025.21