Current challenges of agricultural trade liberalisation between Ukraine and the EU
Received: 09.01.2023
Revised: 30.03.2023
Accepted: 26.04.2023
Abstract
Agriculture is the main specialisation of Ukraine in the international arena, which is associated with its geographical features and relatively inexpensive labour. Despite this, it remains relevant to find opportunities for the development of this industry in the country through the use of all available methods. The purpose of the study is to describe the current challenges that arise in the trade relations between these subjects of international entities. This paper examines how the situation in the agricultural sector can be improved by liberalising trade between Ukraine and the European Union. The main methods used are analysis, prediction, abstraction, and deduction. Within the framework of this study, trends in trade in agricultural products between Ukraine and the European Union are evaluated. The paper establishes that this union became the largest Ukrainian trading partner after the outbreak of war. This was caused both by actions on the part of the European Union in support of Ukraine and by the blockade of seaports, which limited the country's export options to only the land route. The study describes the features of changes in the structure of external trade between the unions in the agricultural sector and proposes specific methods to address existing issues in international interactions between countries to better understand the specific features of economic relations between Ukraine and the European Union. In addition, the study includes recommendations on how to improve relations between these subjects of international relations in the future and solve the difficulties that still exist between them in the trade in agricultural products
Keywords
international relations; macroeconomics; agricultural sector; international politics; Ukrainian European integration
Details
[1] Association agreement between the European Union and Ukraine. (2007). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/yevropejska-integraciya/ugoda-pro-asociacyu.
[2] Balbaa, M. (2022). The impacts of russian-Ukrainian war on the global economy. In The 6th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems (ICFNDS ‘22) (pp. 137-146). Tashkent: Tashkent State University of Economics. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14965.24807.
[3] Balzer, H. (2015). The Ukraine invasion and public opinion. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 16(1), 79-93
[4] Bazhal, M., & Koutchma, T. (2022). Ukraine as a food and grain hub: Impact of science and technology development on food security in the world. Frontiers in Food Science and Technology, 2, article number 1040396. doi: 10.3389/frfst.2022.1040396.
[5] Ericson, R.E., & Zeager, L.A. (2015). Ukraine crisis 2014: A study of russian-Western strategic interaction. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 21(2), 153-190. doi: 10.1515/peps-2015-0006.
[6] Estrada, M.A.R., & Koutronas, E. (2022). The impact of the russian aggression against Ukraine on the russia-EU trade. Journal of Policy Modeling, 44(3), 599-616. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2022.06.004.
[7] Leshchenko, K. (2023). Challenges of implementing the EU’s economic initiatives for the Global South. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 10(3), 49-57. doi: 10.52566/msu-econ3.2023.49.
[8] Khevtsuriani, A.T. (2020). Main positive and negative features of Ukraine’s European integration. Political Life, 2, 52- 56. doi: 10.31558/2519-2949.2020.2.7.
[9] Köhier, C. (1988). Liberalisation and international cooperation. Intereconomics, 23, 55-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02927023.
[10] Kukel, G.S., Roleders, V.V., & Semchuk, I.V. (2020). Estimation of employment in agriculture of Ukraine. Problems of the Systemic Approach in Economics, 1(75), 47-51. doi: 10.32782/2520-2200/2020-1-30.
[11] Mykhaylov, D. (2023). Council of exporters and investors regarding the continuation of the “grain agreement”: Russia is manipulating as always. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/476515-rada-eksporteriv-ta-investoriv-sodoprodovzenna- zernovoi-ugodi-rosia-ak-zavzdi-manipulue/.
[12] Panchenko, Yu. (2023). Small agrarian blockade. We explain the consequences of the EU decision, which weakened the Polish ban. Retrieved from https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2023/05/3/7160872/.
[13] Patil-Dake, J. (2022). Global impact of russian-Ukraine war on economy – A review. International Research Journal Commerce Arts Science, 13(11), 156-162.
[14] Pitlik, H. (2003). The path of liberalization and economic growth. International Review for Social Sciences, 55(1), 57-80. doi: 10.1111/1467-6435.00177.
[15] Rabinovych, M. (2022). EU-Ukraine “deep” trade agenda: The effectiveness and impact perspectives. International Politics, 1-19. doi: 10.1057/s41311-022-00384-x.
[16] Shahini, E., Skuraj, E., Sallaku, F., & Shahini, S. (2022). The supply shock in organic fertilizers for agriculture caused by the effect of russia-Ukraine war. Scientific Horizons, 25(2), 97-103. doi: 10.48077/scihor.25(2).2022.97-103.
[17] Shnyrkov, O., & Chegaiev, O. (2023). Economic integration of Ukraine: Context of the russian-Ukrainian war. Journal of European Economy, 22(1), 49-68.
[18] Siddiqui, K. (2015). Trade liberalization and economic development. International Journal of Political Economy, 44(3), 228-247. doi: 10.1080/08911916.2015.1095050.
[19] Strengthening the blockade of the “grain corridor” is more critical than the ban on imports by a number of EU countries. (2023). Retrieved from https://interfax.com.ua/news/economic/904723.html.
[20] Syal, H.N. (2007). The role of trade liberalization in economic growth: Theories, evidence and challenges. Strategic Studies, 27(3), 50-72.
[21] The EU continues trade benefits for Ukraine. (2023). Retrieved from http://surl.li/jcbip.
[22] The slowdown in inflation and the rate of GDP decline: What explains it. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-economy/3723191-upovilnenna-inflacii-ta-tempiv-padinna-vvp-cim-ce-poasnuetsa.html.
[23] Trade Map. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1.
[24] Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K.H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: New evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 187-231. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhn007.
[25] What weapons are the allies giving Ukraine and what else is needed for victory? (2023). Retrieved from https://tvoemisto.tv/exclusive/skilky_ta_yakoi_zbroi_peredaly_soyuznyky_ukraini_oglyad_134481.html.
[26] World Trade Organization. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/.
[27] Yarbrough, B.V., & Yarbrough, R.M. (1987). Cooperation in the liberalization of international trade: After hegemony, what? International Organization, 41(1), 1-26.
[28] Zabolotnia, N.Ya., & Svidynska, V. (2022). Current condition and prospects for the development of the agrarian sector of Ukraine. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 5, 327-329. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2022-5/75.
[29] Zhytar, M., & Lisnichuk, O. (2022). Prospects of integration of the Ukrainian economy into the European economic area. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 9(3), 86-93. doi: 10.15330/jpnu.9.3.86-93.
Leshchenko, K.
(2023).
Current challenges of agricultural trade liberalisation between Ukraine and the EU.
Ekonomika APK,
30(3),
10-17.
https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202303010