Social capital in the development of social entrepreneurship
The purpose of the article is to theoretically substantiate and analyze the ways in which social capital influences the development of social entrepreneurship. The task of this study is aimed at increasing attention to the impact of social capital on the development of social entrepreneurship and outlining opportunities for effective activities of economic entities. Research methods. The methodological basis of the research is a complex research method - to characterize socially active enterprises operating in Ivano-Frankivsk region, as well as to get acquainted with the world experience of social entrepreneurship. A prerequisite for the formation of social capital of the potential inherent in it is a consistent and systematic solution to the problem, which will include a set of defining principles. The following general and special methods were used in the research process: analysis and synthesis to evaluate the activity of socially active entrepreneurship; analytical groupings - to establish differences between business and social entrepreneurship; abstract-logical during the formation of theoretical generalizations. Research results. The role and place of social capital in the development of social entrepreneurship have been considered. Consistent contexts of studying the theory of social capital are highlighted. The socially active enterprises of Ivano-Frankivsk region are analyzed and the description of achievements of their activity is given. The main directions of social enterprise development in the countryside have been given. The world experience of social entrepreneurship is studied. The differences between business entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship are identified. Scientific novelty. The substantiation of the development of social capital in the development of entrepreneurship has been deepened. The interpretation of social capital gave grounds to consider it as a system that covers the necessary for each episode of the set of subsystems at different levels, which is designed to have a real impact on the development of economic entities. Practical significance. Proposals for scientific understanding of the essence of the potential of socially active enterprises have been developed, which will serve as a basis for deepening theoretical and methodological research on the problems of social capital development in entrepreneurship. The presented provisions are aimed at revealing the typical features and the most significant problematic issues of the characteristics of socially active enterprises of Ivano-Frankivsk region, which need attention from public authorities and local governments. Tabl.: 1. Refs.: 24
1. Alieksieieva, O.V. (2021). Development of agrarian entrepreneurship in the formation of the institutional mechanism of employment. PhD thesis. Kyiv.
2. Balanda, A.L. & Nadraga, V.I. (2013). Social capital of the enterprise: advantages and risks of manifestation. Visnyk Berdianskoho universytetu menedzhmentu i biznesu, 1 (21), 37-41.
3. In Obertin, peasants have joined a cooperative and earn their living from dried fruit. How did they do it?. Retrieved from: https://shotam.info/vobertyni-seliany-ob-iednalys-u-kooperatyv-i-zarobliaiut-nasukhofruktakh-yak-im-tse-vdalos/.
4. Galanec', V.G. (1979).Management efficiency: theory, methodology, practice. Lviv: Vyshcha shk.
5. Demianchuk, O.I. (2011).Formation of properties of social capital of the enterprise. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia: Ekonomika, 16, 270-276.
6. Diuk, A.A. (2021). Development and organizational and economic socialization of rural entrepreneurship: theory, methodology, practice. Doctor`s thesis. Vinnytsia.
7. Eliseeva, L.V. (2017). Economic content and types of social capital. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, 22(1), 8-11.
8. Green Paper on Social Entrepreneurship in Ukraine. (2019). Kyiv: Ukrainskyi Forum Blahodiinykiv.
9. Lupenko, Yu.O., Malik, M.Yo., Zaiats, V.M., Shpykuliak, O.H., et al. (2016). Development of entrepreneurship and cooperation: institutional aspect. Kyiv: NNTs «IAE».
10. Smit, A. (1962). Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Moskva: Socjekgiz.
11. Social entrepreneurship in Ukraine. (2020). Economic and legal analysis. Retrieved from https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/publications/social-entrepreneurship-in-ukraine-economic-and-legal-analysis/.
12. Ukrainian cooperation near Poland in 1928. (1928). Statistics of social cooperatives. Lviv: Reviziinyi soiuz Ukrainskykh kooperatyviv.
13. Shpykuliak, O.H. (2007). Formation of social capital in the agricultural sphere of transformational economy. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 8, 28-34. Retrieved from: http://mts.asu.lt/mtsrbid/article/view/678/704.
14. Shpykuliak, O.H. & Malik, M.Yo. (2019). Institutional analysis of entrepreneuship development in the agrarian sector of economy: methodical aspect. Ekonomika APK, 6, 73-82.
15. Austin J., Stevenson H. (2006). Wei-Skillern. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: The same, different or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 30(1), 1-22. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x.
16. Balaniuk, I., Kozak, I., Balaniuk, S., Kozak-Balaniuk, I., Sas, L., Shelenko, D. (2021). The role of united territorial communities in the functioning of agricultural enterprises. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43(1), 52-66. Retrieved from: https://ejournals.vdu.lt/index.php/mtsrbid/article/view/2148 /1609.
17. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital, w: Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. In J. Richardson (ed.), New York.
18. Dees, J.G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Duke University's Fuqua School of Business, Retrieved from: uke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/03/Article_ Dees_MeaningofSocialEntrepreneurship_2001.pdf.
19. Fukuyama, F. (2003). Social capital, in: Culture Matters. In L.E. Harrison, S. P. Huntington (Eds.), Krakow: Zysk i S-ka.
20. Hanifan, L.J. (1916). The Rural School Community Center, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/ doi/10.1177/000271621606700118.
21. Putnam, R.D. (1995). Democracy in action. Civic Traditions in Contemporary Italy. Kraków: Znak.
22. Putnam, R.D. (2001). Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1). Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/6/1825848.pdf.
23. Development of social entrepreneurship in Poland and selected European Union countries. The report was commissioned by the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development by the Institute of Labor Market Analysis. (2020). Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/spoeczna-przedsibiorczo_12-11-2020_popr_z-okadk.pdf.
24. Zadek S. & Thake S. (1997). Send in the social entrepreneurs. New Statesman, 26(31).