Features of strategic planning of rural territorial community development
The purpose of the article is to scientifically justify an index of rural territorial community development as the basis for strategic planning at the local management level. Research methodology. The methodological and theoretical basis of the article has been formed by the modern works of domestic and foreign scientists, as well as the results of their own research. In the research process have been used such methods and techniques: monographic, abstract and logical, statistical-economic, index, system-structural analysis and synthesis. Research results. The researches of many economists on evaluation of development of social infrastructure and living standards of the population are concentrated on the “traditional” ways to solve the problems of preserving of rural areas and rural settlements. Furthermore modern evaluation methods can be used only for an analysis of the macroeconomic environment. At the same time, such methods disregard the specific features of the functioning of rural households, their role in economic circulation ensuring, as well as the impact on external environment. Elements of scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the proposed methodological approaches to evaluation of the current state of the rural territorial community development through the usage of a generalizing indicator that characterizes the internal and external environment of functioning of rural households. Practical significance. Implementation of developed modern toolkit will make it possible to develop and substantiate strategic plans and programs for rural territorial community development at the local management level. Tabl .: 2. Fig. 2. Bibliographer: 24
[1] Danylyshyn, B.M. (2009). Sotsialni priorytety ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Social priorities of economic development]. Ekonomika. Upravlinnia. Innovatsii, 1. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/eui_2009_1_7 [In Ukrainian].
[2] Zbarskyi, V.K., & Lypoviak-Melkozorova, A.I. (2011). Osobysti selianski hospodarstva – osnovna formuvannia maloho pidpryiemnytstva na seli : nauk. dop. [Personal private households – the main formation of small entrepreneurship in the countryside: scientific report]. V.K. Zbarskyi (Ed.). Kyiv: NNTs IAE [In Ukrainian].
[3] Krasnomovets, V.A. (2014). Suchasnyi stan ta osnovni napriamy pidvyshchennia rivnia zhyttia naselennia [Current situation and main directions of improving the living standards of population]. Finansovyi prostir. Mizhnarodnyi naukovopraktychnyi zhurnal, 4 (16), pp. 107–115 [In Ukrainian].
[4] Kropyvko, M.M. (2008). Analiz ta praktychne vprovadzhennia dosvidu krain z rynkovoiu ekonomikoiu po formuvanniu dovhostrokovoi prohramy rozvytku ahropromyslovoho kompleksu Ukrainy [Analysis and practical application of the experience of market economy countries in forming a long-term program of development of the agro-industrial complex of Ukraine]. Innovatsiina ekonomika, 1, pp. 27–31 [In Ukrainian].
[5] Kropyvko, M.M. (2016). Rol hospodarstv naselennia u zabezpechenni potreb liudyny [Role of private households in the provision of human needs]. Ekonomika APK, 4, pp. 38–45 [In Ukrainian].
[6] Lisovyi, A.V., & Zalizko, V.D. (2013). Teoretykometodolohichni aspekty vyboru innovatyvno-innovatsiinoho shliakhu sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku silskykh terytorii [Theoretical and methodological aspects of the of innovationinnovative choice of way of socio-economic rural development]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Irpinskoi finansovo-yurydychnoi akademii (ekonomika, pravo), 2. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/znpifyua_2013_2_5 [In Ukrainian].
[7] Libanova, E.M., Makarova, O.V., Kurylo, I.O. et al. (2012). Liudskyi rozvytok v Ukraini: sotsialni ta demohrafichni chynnyky modernizatsii natsionalnoi ekonomiky (kolektyvna monohrafiia) [Human Development in Ukraine: social and demographic factors for modernization of the national economy (collective monograph)]. E.M. Libanova (Ed.). Kyiv: In-t demohrafii ta sotsialnykh doslidzhen im. M.V. Ptukhy NAN Ukrainy [In Ukrainian].
[8] Mesel-Veseliak, V.Ya. (2005). Rozvytok silskykh terytorii v konteksti zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi stabilnosti derzhavy [Rural development in terms of providing economic stability of the state]. Ekonomika APK, 3, p. 68 [In Ukrainian].
[9] Libanova, E.M., Makarova, O.V., Kurylo, I.O. et al. (2012). Metodyka vymiriuvannia rehionalnoho liudskoho rozvytku [Method of measuring regional human development]. E.M. Libanova (Ed.). Kyiv: In-t demohrafii ta sotsialnykh doslidzhen imeni M.V. Ptukhy [In Ukrainian].
[10] Orlatyi, M.K. (2015). Metodolohichni pidkhody shchodo sotsialno-infrastrukturnoho potentsialu terytorialnykh hromad sela [Methodological approaches to the social and infrastructural potential of rural territorial communities]. Produktyvnist ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva. ekonomichni nauky, 27, pp. 125–132 [In Ukrainian].
[11] Pavlov, O.I. (2008). Silskyi rozvytok v Ukraini: teoriia, praktyka, polityka, upravlinnia : monohrafiia [Rural development in Ukraine: theory, practice, politics, management: monograph]. Odessa: Astroprynt [In Ukrainian].
[12] Sava, A.P., Parkhomets, M.K., Sydorchuk, B.O. et al. (2017). Propozytsii shchodo metodychnykh pidkhodiv z vyvchennia orhanizatsiino-strukturnoho stanovlennia silskykh terytorii ta yikh zbalansovanoho rozvytku : naukovopraktychne vydannia [Proposals on methodological approaches to studying the organizational and structural formation of rural territories and their balanced development: scientific and practical publication]. Ternopil: TDSHDS IKSHP NAAN [In Ukrainian].
[13] Malik, M.Y., Kropyvko, M.M., Mamchur, V.A. et al. (2017). Rozvytok selianskykh hospodarstv v umovakh transformatsii ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky : naukove vydannia [Development of peasant farms in terms of transformation of the agrarian sector of economy: scientific publication]. M.Y. Malik (Ed.). Kyiv: NNTs “IAE” [In Ukrainian].
[14] Riabokon, V.P. (2015). Problemy formuvannia sotsialnoekonomichnykh umov rozvytku ukrainskoho sela [Problems of formation of socio-economic conditions of Ukrainian rural development]. Ekonomika APK, 9, p. 68 [In Ukrainian].
[15] Borodina, O.M., & Prokopa, I.V. (Eds.) (2010). Teoriia, polityka ta praktyka liudskoho rozvytku [Theory, politics and practice of human development]. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy; In-t ekon. ta prohnozuv. [In Ukrainian].
[16] Sabluk, P.T., Kropyvko, M.F., Bulavka, O.H. et al. (2011). Upravlinnia kompleksnym rozvytkom ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva i silskykh terytorii [Management of integrated development of agro-industrial production and rural territories]. P.T. Sabluk & M.F. Kropyvko (Eds.). Kyiv: NNTs IAE [In Ukrainian].
[17] Shpychak, O.M., & Svynous, I.V. (2008). Realizatsiia produktsii osobystym selianskym hospodarstvom – vytraty, tsiny, efektyvnist : monohrafiia [Realization of products by personal private household – costs, prices, efficiency: mono graph]. Kyiv: NNTs IAE [In Ukrainian].
[18] Yurchyshyn, V.V. (2005). Silski terytorii yak sys temoutvoriuiuchi faktory rozvytku ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky [Rural territories as system-generating factors of development of the agrarian sector of economy]. Ekonomika APK, 3, pp. 3–10 [In Ukrainian].
[19] Country Rankings. 2016 Index of economic freedom. Re trieved from: www.heritage.org/index/ranking [In English].
[20] Sikora, T. (2006). Strategia rozwoju obszarów wiejskich. Polska – Ukraina. Stare Pole [In Polish].
[21] Socio-economic development strategy for the Malbork district 2002–2012. (2002). Malbork [In English].
[22] Schwab, K. (Ed.) (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global Competitive nessReport_2015-2016.pdf [In English].
[23] Zintegrovana strategia rozwoju obszarow wiejskich kanalu Elblaskiego. (2006). Elblag, Ostroda, Ilawa [In Polish].
[24] Zintegrovana strategia rozwoju obszarow wiejskich powiatu Kwidzynskiego. (2006). Kwidzyn, Warszawa [In Polish].